Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:13
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Report: Steelers expect to have a deal with T.J. Watt by the start of the season - NBC Sports
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Who are some good social skills therapists in Pompano Beach, Florida?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
James Bond game 007 First Light gets first trailer - The Verge
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Librarians breathe easy as tool spots toxic book pigment - The Times
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are some “hard to swallow” facts about K-pop?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The tiny Logitech Keys-To-Go 2 keyboard lets me get work done almost anywhere - CNN